Sun Folds
|
SUNSHOPPER
|
SUNEMPLOYMENT
|
ADVERTISE
|
FACEBOOK
|
LINKEDIN
|
TWITTER
|
INSTAGRAM
Thursday, March 4, 2021
HOME
NEWS
News
Human Interest
Labour & Immigration
Environment
Marine reserve
Economy
Education
Politics
Ministerial Statements
Crime
Breakaway
Weekender
Back in the Day
Sun Girl / Sun Guy
Midweek
Throne Speech 2013
SAGE Report 2013
Year in Review 2013
Budget 2014
Augmented Reality
BUSINESS
Business
Shipping
Retail
Tourism & Hospitality
Finance
Economy
Technology
Columns
Matters in Healthcare
Ask the Expert
Insurance
Press Releases
Law
Boston: Strong Ties to Bermuda
OPINION
Larry Burchall
Letters
Opinion
Shawnette Somner
Burton's Banter
Wise Up
Christopher Famous
Craig Cannonier
Marc Bean
Jeremy Deacon
Elaine Murray
Jonathan Starling
Bryant Trew
Eron Hill
SPORTS
Cricket
Cricket fixtures
Cup Match 2013
Track & Field
Bowling
Tennis
Football
Boxing
Softball
Basketball
Sailing
Equestrian
Martial Arts
Cycling
Squash
Golf
Gymnastics
Triathlon
Rugby
Field Hockey
Swimming
Sports
Pool and Snooker
Olympics
Motor Sports
Youth Sports
Columns
Sports chick
Wells at Wembley
Island Games
Cup Match 2013
World Cup
Cup Match 2014
LIFE
Lifestyle
Movies
Arts & Entertainment
Music
Community
Food
Travel
Fashion
Health and Fitness
Enter contests
Peace Day Contest
Bermemes exclusive
Makeover Contest
Bermuda Festival 2014
FAITH
Faith
Pastor Gary Simons
Walia Ming
Rev. Maria Seaman
Shabnam Jheengoor
NOTICES
Legals & Notices
Marriages
Announcements
Obituaries
Submit an obituary
Advertise
Contact Us
RSS Feeds
FEATURES
Newport Bermuda 2014
Cup Match 2014
Community pays the price of economic expansion
We’re losing our friendliness and our land — and SDOs are just another nail in the coffin
Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:48 AM
'Bermudian consultant Val Wallace surveyed 2,500 Bermudians. She found 94 per cent of us feel very strongly that no more open space should be developed.'
In many facets of Bermuda life, we have thrown out the quite sensible ways of doing things that were in keeping with living in 'paradise', and we have begun to copy the ways of others.
The irony is that those others would come to visit Bermuda to get away from the very habits of speed and scale that we now seek to emulate.
For decades, perhaps centuries, Bermuda was a leader in "cutting our suit to fit our cloth". We recognized that the small size of our Island could be overwhelmed by oversized anything.
We recognized, for example, that the size and configuration of our roads dictated our use of smaller vehicles travelling at moderate speeds. We built modest homes, we ate modest meals, lived modest lives.
But that was then. As individuals, we pay sometimes a severe price for eating too much or driving too fast. As a community we are paying steep prices for too rapid economic expansion.
As an example, some Bermudians can't find affordable housing. We now know that the very same International Business sector that is filling, and perhaps overfilling, our coffers is spiking the rise in housing prices. We also know that without stable housing, families have a harder time doing the job we desperately need them to do, that is, raise healthy, well-educated, productive citizens
It seems like we're looking to further boost the economy via a parallel expansion in tourism. Are we seeking a rise in tourist numbers because we need the jobs? Or are we looking to diversify our economy? Or do we just want to have another number we can say is going up? Just what is the plan for tourism?
Bermuda's reputation as an ideal tourist destination came largely from two factors, our incredibly hospitable and friendly people, and our unique environmental amenity. Already, our culture has shifted. Our younger generations do not exhibit the cordial and friendly greeting to strangers the way we used to. Add to that the rise in xenophobic feelings, attitudes and behaviour and one key element of Bermuda's historic attractiveness to tourists has disappeared.
With the move from Bermuda's uniquely attractive natural environment and local architecture, to beachfront fortresses, concrete coastal structures and every-other-destination design, we convert another cultural aspect from plus to minus. We are systematically destroying not just our Island, but also our people.
Then there are the Special Development Orders (SDOs) pending for hotel-related development, six of them I think. SDOs are officially at the discretion of the Minister of the Environment. Of course the entire Cabinet shares collective responsibility.
The original purpose of an SDO was to deal with development issues of national importance. They were rarely used. Since 1992, however, some 20 SDOs have been invoked; 18 since 1996. Similarly, "Section 34" protection covenants, which were once considered sacrosanct, have recently been amended or rescinded.
Historically, SDOs were only invoked AFTER an application went through the planning process: Development Applications Board (DAB) deliberations, objectors' input and an offshore inspector. The Minister then had the benefit of all that input. More recently SDOs have been invoked BEFORE the planning process was even engaged; the DAB and objectors were bypassed.
SDOs have now become a tool to enable applications to speed through and past the planning process, and may in fact deprive objectors of a right to participate in the process. Putting the SDO cart before the horse of the planning process certainly violates the spirit of sustainable development.
Sensible citizens must resist this short-circuiting of process. We must work to change the mindset. Now we have to strongly encourage our leaders to heed the will of the people.
And the will of the people was clearly expressed in a report on Open Spaces, Population, and Housing done by Bermudian consultant Val Wallace who surveyed 2,500 Bermudians. She found that 94 per cent of Bermudians feel very strongly that no more open space should be developed. Her report also found that Bermuda should be saving at least 25 per cent of its land resources as open space.
The report recommended and I quote:
"Protections for Bermuda's open spaces should be made stricter in the upcoming Bermuda Plan so as to ensure that existing open spaces, woodland, arable land, woodland reserve and so on does not give way to development over time. The protections in the new Bermuda Plan should then be supplemented by revisions to the Planning Act that place greater limits on Ministerial authority to override decisions by the Development Applications Board on appeal."
Meanwhile, we must make sure that in the process of catering to tourists we do not make Bermuda too costly, too foreign, and too unfriendly for its Bermudian natives.
It is only with our care, our close attention, our vigilance and our willingness to act that Bermuda, our unique Island and Bermudians, our unique people, can become truly
sustainable.
X
Search only accepts letters and numbers.
MOST READ
Exclusive: Superstar Beres Hammond surprises his biggest fan
Why did lawyer doorstep the Premier?
How Collie Buddz got the girl
The importance of eating three meals a day
Painful chapter in our history revisited
LATEST NEWS
Media reflects on Bermuda Sun closure
Cup Match: What’s open, where and when
Sun closure: Honoured to have led the Sun’s news team
FCO Minister: I have full confidence in the Governor
Swimmer rescued in Bailey’s Bay
PRC status
Should PRC holders get status?
Yes
Some of them
No
Don't know
Tweets by @BDASun
NEWS
BUSINESS
OPINION
SPORTS
LIFE
FAITH
FEATURES
NOTICES
ABOUT US
Sun Folds
|
SUNSHOPPER
|
SUNEMPLOYMENT
|
ADVERTISE
|
FACEBOOK
|
LINKEDIN
|
TWITTER
|
INSTAGRAM
Copyright © 2005-2021 Bermuda Sun Ltd. All Rights Reserved. For more information see our
Terms of Service
.
Software Copyright © 1998-2021 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##